> Resources and Publications > PHC RIS infoBytes > Researchers influencing policy development

  

Researchers influencing policy development

 

Researchers and policy makers bring different perspectives to the policy making process. This infoByte outlines some key issues for researchers to consider when influencing policy development.

overview

Constructive communication between researchers and policy makers supports the development of effective, evidence based public policy. Communication in this context is guided by:

  • researchers' understanding of policy and the policy development processes
  • policy makers' appreciation of what is involved in research
  • the development and maintenance of productive relationships based on:
    • commitment to common goals
    • negotiation of realistic expectations
    • fostering of shared understanding
    • respect and trust.

Understanding policy

What is policy

Policy is a course of action; a deliberate plan of action to guide decisions and achieve rational outcome(s). The term may apply to government, private sector organisations and groups, and individuals.
Policy emerges and evolves over time. It can be influenced by change in areas including:

  • prevailing values, views of evidence and the world
  • how the causes and likely effects of a 'problem' are interpreted
  • what is feasible according to factors such as social climate, public opinion and practitioner engagement
  • who has power and influence.

How is policy developed?

Policy development occurs at many levels and involves interactions between:

  • policy-makers (politicians and public servants)
  • policy influences (inside and outside government)
  • Government Advisory Committees ('expert opinion')
  • the public ('public opinion')
  • the media (influencing both policy holders and public opinion).

What does the policy development process cover?

  • Identification of the issue
  • Getting the issue on the policy development agenda
  • Development of a guiding strategy or framework
  • Development of policy options
  • Adoption of the policy
  • Implementation of the policy
  • Evaluation of the policy.

How Researchers can Inform the Policy Process

Stay informed...

  • Find out about the political processes and players relevant to your area of research, including policy development timelines and cycles.
  • Fit research focus and activities as closely as possible to the people, processes and timelines.
  • Stay alert to opportunities for influencing change including:
    • changes in belief/value systems (associated changes in government)
    • emergence of specific issues (ie. an outbreak of communicable disease, increased prevalence of chronic illness)
    • strong public and media engagement on issues.

Linkage and Exchange

  • During your research project, establish and maintain ongoing communication with policy makers who have similar goals, or areas of interest. Keep them informed about your activities and results.
  • Include policy makers in research project activities like design, planning, implementation and interpretation of results. This helps to frame research questions and negotiate meanings in the area to be researched.

Use your networks

  • Target your results at a wide range of audiences.
  • Be actively involved. Participate in committees, professional associations and interest groups.
  • Engage with persons of influence. They may in turn influence policy.
  • Professional associations and peak bodies may champion research results in the policy making process.

Be realistic...

  • Understand getting research results into policy is a social - political process. Your research findings may be incompatible with other major policy directions.
  • It may take years for relevant research to be incorporated into policy.
  • It is rarely appropriate for policy decisions to be made on the findings of a single study.
  • Realise that policy is formulated at many different levels, so think local as well as national.

Emphasise implications of research...

  • Demonstrate how your results fit with policy vision. Your contact people in policy may help you to understand this.
  • Be practical in your recommendations: describe clearly what needs to change, what should be done and how it could be done.
  • Provide short concise summaries - one to two pages to complement longer reports.
  • Do not wait until your research is published to inform policy makers of the results.

 

Printed Resource

This information is available in a FREE colour printed fact sheet Dissemination matters

  • Download the PDF [140.6KB]
  • Complete our order form to have a hard copy mailed out to you

Resources

View FOCUS on FOCUS on... Knowledge brokering

View infoByte Knowledge translation and exchange for health policy

PHC RIS: Primary Health Care Research Impact Project Stage 1 (2007) and Stage 2 (2008)

Checklists for assessing research - policy interactions:
Bammer G. (2008). ANU College of Medicine and Health Sciences

How to give a research presentation to decision makers
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.

Research, public policymaking, and knowledge-translation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridges
Lavis J. (2006). Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26, 37-45

Where Different Worlds Collide: Expanding the Influence of Research and Researchers on Policy
Moodie R. (2009). Journal of Public Health Policy 30, S33-S37

What influences the transfer of research into health policy and practice? Observations from England and Australia.
Nutbeam D & Boxall A. (2008). Public Health 122, 747-753.

Tools for Policy Impact: A Handbook for Researchers
Start D, Hovland I. (2004). London: Overseas Development Institute

 

Content updated by Christina Hagger
View more infoBytes on research and evaluation
 
  privacy  |  disclaimer  |  copyright  |  quality  |  feedback  
last updated Fri 02 Sep 2011, 05:55 GMT
Top of page
More information on page